← Back to portfolio

12 / 26 · Networking

ANET

Arista Networks

3%target weight
Latest available close$204.52-3% · vs previous close
DAILY CLOSE · USDYahoo Finance ↗

Loading dated research data…

——

Daily candles, not a live feed. Price series is split-adjusted; total-return mode uses provider-adjusted prices including distributions. The chart does not predict returns.

A great business. At what price?

Test earnings growth against a change in valuation. All multiples below are your assumptions — not current company fundamentals.

Illustrative price CAGR—

CAGR = (1 + EPS growth) × (exit P/E ÷ entry P/E)^(1/years) − 1. Excludes dividends, dilution beyond EPS, taxes and fees. Not a price target. Not suitable for gold, bonds or companies with negative earnings.

RESEARCH ENGINE / 1.2

What must this price deliver?

Inspect reported numbers, test your assumptions and follow the next filing. A calculation is not an approved investment case.

Loading dated research…

NORMALIZATION / v1.0.0

Normalization workpaper

A company-specific protocol, not an approved normalized cash flow.

Special model required
Model familyEquity cash-per-share DCF
OCF − cash capex / diluted shareNo valid reported proxy
Price / reported cash proxy—

Required adjustment tests

  1. cycle

    Use through-cycle demand, margins and utilization rather than a peak or trough year.

  2. concentration

    Stress customer concentration, insourcing and contract cancellation.

  3. sbc

    Measure dilution and treat share compensation consistently with per-share cash.

  4. capex split

    Separate maintenance/replacement capex from expansion capex; do not assume either number.

✓ Model specification completeIC valuation approval: 0 · TRADE AUTHORIZED: NO

Reported financial base

Annual period: 2025-01-01 → 2025-12-31Filed: 2026-02-17Reporting currency: USDLast source retrieval: 2026-09-18T22:00:49.022Z

Unreviewed extraction

Reported financial base
MetricValueUnitSource
Revenue9,005,700,000USDus-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax ↗
Operating income3,856,100,000USDus-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss ↗
Net income3,511,400,000USDus-gaap:NetIncomeLoss ↗
Operating cash flow4,371,900,000USDus-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities ↗
Cash capital expenditure——Missing / manual review
Share-based compensation439,200,000USDus-gaap:ShareBasedCompensation ↗
Weighted diluted shares1,275,700,000sharesus-gaap:WeightedAverageNumberOfDilutedSharesOutstanding ↗
Cash and equivalents1,963,900,000USDus-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue ↗
Current long-term debt——Missing / manual review
Noncurrent long-term debt——Missing / manual review
OCF − cash capex (not normalized)— USDNormalized owner cash: not approved

Annual figures, not trailing twelve months. No automatic currency/ADR conversion. Cash proxy excludes review of leases, debt service, SBC, acquisitions and cycle. Missing values are not zero.

Company-specific method

DCF with explicit hardware-margin competition and recurring software/service contribution.

Your scenario · not our forecast

Equity-per-share DCF: do not subtract net debt again. Future dilution must already be included in cash-per-share growth. This does not measure analyst consensus. Replacement capex and sustainable terminal cash still require review.

What changed?

Loading dated research…

Follow this thesis

RSS · ANET

RSS, not email: your reader stores subscriptions. Copying a link does not subscribe you automatically. No account or email is collected.

FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH · 2026-09-06

The investment case, under examination.

A dated research map, not completed valuations. The 25-company portfolio baseline is unchanged; IBM is monitored at 0% outside it. Public facts do not establish an edge: every hypothesis still needs normalized financials, price-implied expectations and independent forward tests.

Hypothesis · not a trading signal

Q2 2026 · Published 2026-08-04 · Source checked 2026-09-06

01 / What the issuer reported
Revenue was $3.036bn, up 37.7% year over year.
02 / Our hypothesis — not established alpha
Ethernet may gain AI-network spending share; open standards do not automatically guarantee Arista captures the margin.
03 / What to measure next
Disclosed AI-network revenue, large-customer concentration, gross margin, deferred revenue and cash conversion.
04 / What would challenge the thesis
Reassess if AI-network deployments shift to rivals or white boxes while Arista’s margins or customer retention weaken.
05 / Appropriate valuation method
DCF with explicit hardware-margin competition and recurring software/service contribution.
06 / Still missing
Missing: comparable AI-fabric share data; headline growth is not proof of share gains.

No measured consensus gap or approved price target. A familiar good business can still be an expensive stock.

Issuer-reported figures, not an independent accounting audit. Review after the next report or material filing. These review triggers are proposed, not automatic sell rules. Weights and paper mandates are unchanged.

Why this position exists

High-speed Ethernet AI fabrics

Ethernet can scale as an open AI fabric while EOS gives Arista a software-quality advantage.

Principal risk

Customer concentration, InfiniBand and hyperscaler self-design.

What the daily radar monitors

01AI networking revenuePRIMARY KPI
02800G/1.6T adoptionTREND + GUIDANCE
03Cloud concentrationTHESIS TRIGGER
Decision rule

A headline never changes a weight by itself. The system verifies the primary source, tests the KPI trend and creates a proposal for the investment committee.

RESEARCH → UNDERSTANDING → VIRTUAL ACCOUNT

Turn curiosity into a risk decision.

Compare the original portfolio with two defensive candidates. Then explore a virtual account — real trading stays locked.

Open the portfolio lab ↗Explore the virtual account ↗